Full Disclosure mailing list archives
RE: Comparing Algorithms On The List OfHard-to-brut-force?
From: "Aditya Deshmukh" <aditya.deshmukh () online gateway strangled net>
Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 13:14:51 +0530
views?
Only on 2 of them
---------- AES
I would put my money on this one because this is a std. does all the encryption very fast and can be extended as per the security requirments: you want more security than 128 bit you can have 192, you want more you can go to virtually any number AES256 is right now the sweet spot and is quite fast as comapred to Triple DES
Triple DES
Good algo, but cannot be extended beyond 168 bit and has a lot of subtle pitfalls which the programmer might fall into like selecting ECB or EBC mode. Also is very slow - bad for large amount of data ________________________________________________________________________ Delivered using the Free Personal Edition of Mailtraq (www.mailtraq.com) _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- Comparing Algorithms On The List Of Hard-to-brut-force? Bipin Gautam (Nov 01)
- RE: Comparing Algorithms On The List OfHard-to-brut-force? Brandon Enright (Nov 01)
- Re: Comparing Algorithms On The List OfHard-to-brut-force? Andrew Farmer (Nov 01)
- Re: Comparing Algorithms On The List OfHard-to-brut-force? James Longstreet (Nov 01)
- Re: Comparing Algorithms On The List OfHard-to-brut-force? Bipin Gautam (Nov 01)
- RE: Comparing Algorithms On The List OfHard-to-brut-force? Aditya Deshmukh (Nov 01)
- RE: Comparing Algorithms On The List OfHard-to-brut-force? Brandon Enright (Nov 01)