Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: RE: Bening Worms (Cosmin Stejerean)
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Sat, 14 May 2005 20:40:55 -0400
On Sun, 15 May 2005 12:20:25 +1200, Nick FitzGerald said:
Stejerean, Cosmin wrote:I think you are going a little overboard with this kind of response. The guyNope. The guy is clearly a chopper.
A perfect proof of why benign worms are a Bad Idea. I've attached the Subject: lines from the original thread, and the current sub-thread: Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Benign Worms Subject: [Full-disclosure] RE: Bening Worms (Cosmin Stejerean) If the *subject* line has sprouted a mutation from 'Benign' to 'Bening', why should we trust the *entire worm* not to mutate? ;) (And no - I do *NOT* want to hear "but I typed that one in by hand" as an excuse or rationalization. The Subject: had a mutation. And that's all that's important.)
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- RE: Bening Worms (Cosmin Stejerean) Stejerean, Cosmin (May 14)
- Re: RE: Bening Worms (Cosmin Stejerean) Valdis . Kletnieks (May 14)
- Re: RE: Bening Worms (Cosmin Stejerean) Nick FitzGerald (May 14)
- Re: RE: Bening Worms (Cosmin Stejerean) Valdis . Kletnieks (May 14)
- RE: RE: Bening Worms (Cosmin Stejerean)= Mutated Randall M (May 15)
- Re: RE: Bening Worms (Cosmin Stejerean) purplebag (May 14)
- Re: RE: Bening Worms (Cosmin Stejerean) Jeremy Bishop (May 14)
- Re: RE: Bening Worms (Cosmin Stejerean) Valdis . Kletnieks (May 14)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: RE: Bening Worms (Cosmin Stejerean) Stejerean, Cosmin (May 15)
- Re: RE: Bening Worms (Cosmin Stejerean) Valdis . Kletnieks (May 15)