Full Disclosure mailing list archives
RE: windows linux final study
From: Ron DuFresne <dufresne () winternet com>
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 20:44:04 -0600 (CST)
On Tue, 29 Mar 2005, Lachniet, Mark wrote:
Curmudgeon, Yes, but did you actually verify their research using their methodology to see if they screwed up?
[SNIP] But, if the conclusions are patently false, to say the least, does it matter if the underlying methodology has any tendency to soundness? <or does it actually highlight that the methodology was as bogus as the conclusions?> Thanks, Ron DuFresne -- "Sometimes you get the blues because your baby leaves you. Sometimes you get'em 'cause she comes back." --B.B. King ***testing, only testing, and damn good at it too!*** OK, so you're a Ph.D. Just don't touch anything. _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- RE: windows linux final study, (continued)
- RE: windows linux final study ChrisDay (Mar 29)
- RE: windows linux final study David Solbach (Mar 29)
- RE: windows linux final study David Solbach (Mar 29)
- RE: windows linux final study security curmudgeon (Mar 29)
- Re: windows linux final study Florian Weimer (Mar 29)
- Re: windows linux final study Joerg Kurz (Mar 29)
- Re: windows linux final study Ron (Mar 29)
- RE: windows linux final study David Solbach (Mar 29)
- RE: windows linux final study ChrisDay (Mar 29)
- RE: windows linux final study Lachniet, Mark (Mar 29)
- RE: windows linux final study security curmudgeon (Mar 29)
- RE: windows linux final study Ron DuFresne (Mar 29)
- RE: windows linux final study Mark J Cox (Mar 30)
- RE: windows linux final study ChrisDay (Mar 29)