Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Reverse engineering the Windows TCP stack
From: Vladamir <wireless.insecurity () gmail com>
Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2005 14:24:53 -0500
I am working on some examples, that you can hopefully replicate, I lost my Windows 2k Server disk, so just hold your horses!
Thierry Zoller wrote:
Dear Vlad, V> I never said it incorrectly behaved, I said it inconsistently behaves. I am sorry, you implied that. Quote Vlad: "BSD behaves <correctly>, why can't Windows?" The negation of correcly is incorrectly, you should have said "bsd behaves consisteletly and windows does not"... I doubt you are up to something accept to troll on this list, the name of the list is "full disclosure" not "We defy logic".
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- RE: Reverse engineering the Windows TCP stack, (continued)
- Message not available
- RE: Reverse engineering the Windows TCP stack Wade Woolwine (Mar 24)
- Re: Reverse engineering the Windows TCP stack Nicolas RUFF (lists) (Mar 31)
- Re: Reverse engineering the Windows TCP stack Tim (Mar 24)
- Re: Reverse engineering the Windows TCP stack James Longstreet (Mar 24)
- Re: Reverse engineering the Windows TCP stack Vladamir (Mar 25)
- Re: Reverse engineering the Windows TCP stack Thierry Zoller (Mar 25)
- Re: Reverse engineering the Windows TCP stack Vladamir (Mar 25)
- Re: Reverse engineering the Windows TCP stack ADT (Mar 25)
- Re: Reverse engineering the Windows TCP stack Thierry Zoller (Mar 26)
- Re: Reverse engineering the Windows TCP stack Vladamir (Mar 26)
- Re: Reverse engineering the Windows TCP stack Vladamir (Mar 24)
- Re: Reverse engineering the Windows TCP stack Thierry Zoller (Mar 31)