Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Reuters: Microsoft to give holes info to Uncle Sam first - responsible vendor notification may not be a good idea any more...
From: Vincent van Scherpenseel <mailinglists () vanscherpenseel nl>
Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2005 17:18:36 +0100
On Sunday 13 March 2005 14:13, James Tucker wrote:
If you don't know, why are you speaking?
Because we are allowed to? So, just because we don't know the truth we shouldn't share our guesses? I thought this was Full Disclosure! - Vincent van Scherpenseel -- http://vincent.vanscherpenseel.nl _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://www.secunia.com/
Current thread:
- RE: Reuters: Microsoft to give holes info to UncleSam first - responsible vendor notification may not be a good idea anymore..., (continued)
- Re: Reuters: Microsoft to give holes info to Uncle Sam first - responsible vendor notification may not be a good idea any more... Raj Mathur (Mar 12)
- Re: Reuters: Microsoft to give holes info to Uncle Sam first - responsible vendor notification may not be a good idea any more... Anders Langworthy (Mar 15)
- Re: Reuters: Microsoft to give holes info to Uncle Sam first - responsible vendor notification may not be a good idea any more... Niek (Mar 12)
- Re: Reuters: Microsoft to give holes info to Uncle Sam first - responsible vendor notification may not be a good idea any more... Scott Edwards (Mar 13)
- Re[2]: Reuters: Microsoft to give holes info to UncleSam first - responsible vendor notification may not be a goodidea any more... phased (Mar 13)
- Re: Reuters: Microsoft to give holes info to Uncle Sam first - responsible vendor notification may not be a good idea any more... James Tucker (Mar 13)
- Re: Reuters: Microsoft to give holes info to Uncle Sam first - responsible vendor notification may not be a good idea any more... Vincent van Scherpenseel (Mar 13)