Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: iDownload/iSearch responds to Spyware Critics
From: King Fuddler <darkiye () gmail com>
Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2005 11:41:22 +0000
I agree totally. What's even more interesting is that Apple Computers hasn't gotten itself involved - a company getting this much exposure with this degree of copyright infringement in its product name is surely going to catch Jobs' eye sooner or later. It ought to be fun to watch when someone eventually pulls together enough money and lawyers to send them to their doom. On Fri, 11 Mar 2005 09:58:57 -0500, bkfsec <bkfsec () sdf lonestar org> wrote:
Paul Laudanski wrote: What's truly interesting is that the legal counsel for iDownload/iSearch indicates that there is a "lively debate" going on on the internet about whether or not their program is spyware or not. Maybe I'm not looking in the same places, but I have never seen any debate regarding the classification of these programs, at least not a lively one. As for my own experience, I've witnessed iSearch/iDownload packages being installed on systems during adware/spyware infestations. Only one conclusion can be gained from that: You guys are on the right side of this argument and these people need to be opposed. Their assertions are laughable. -Barry
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://www.secunia.com/
Current thread:
- Re: iDownload/iSearch responds to Spyware Critics bkfsec (Mar 11)
- Re: iDownload/iSearch responds to Spyware Critics King Fuddler (Mar 13)
- Re: Re: iDownload/iSearch responds to Spyware Critics Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 13)
- Re: Re: iDownload/iSearch responds to Spyware Critics bkfsec (Mar 14)
- Re: Re: iDownload/iSearch responds to Spyware Critics Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 13)
- Re: iDownload/iSearch responds to Spyware Critics King Fuddler (Mar 13)