Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Publishing exploit code ruled illegal in France?
From: "class 101" <class101 () hat-squad com>
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2005 16:51:33 +0100
nothing would have happened to the hacker, if he had not published his eye-catching stuff.
the corporation wanted to punish this hacker because he somehow ruined their reputation ... and they did it successfully.
Omg and how is the reputation of ms ? oracle? phpbb ? ca ? etc .. is their reputation so ruined ? I'd better think their reputation is growing as soon as they quickly fix the tool instead of to spend their customers money in court when the real things are said ...
now french guys will think twice before publishing eye-catching stuff("i'm using illegal software?", "should i hide myself?", etc) ...
"clap,clap" Cheers to my compatriot Tena ------------------------------------------------------------- class101 Jr. Researcher Hat-Squad.com ------------------------------------------------------------- ----- Original Message ----- From: "Liu Die Yu" <liudieyu () umbrella name> To: "jean-philippe Gaulier" <jean-philippe.gaulier () unilim fr> Cc: <full-disclosure () lists grok org uk> Sent: Friday, March 11, 2005 10:47 PM Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Publishing exploit code ruled illegal in France?
nothing would have happened to the hacker, if he had not published his eye-catching stuff. the corporation wanted to punish this hacker because he somehow ruined their reputation ... and they did it successfully. now french guys will think twice before publishing eye-catching stuff("i'm using illegal software?", "should i hide myself?", etc) ... such fear and sense of sin is what software vendors want. jean-philippe Gaulier wrote:On Wed, 09 Mar 2005 15:40:46 +0100 sec-list () nolog org wrote: Hi,in France some strange things happen: http://www.zdnet.com.au/news/security/0,2000061744,39183862,00.htmI disagree with this article. I'm french, I know Guillaume and don't like Viguard, so I think that I could chat about that a little more. Guillaume was convicted not for his publication, but because he used
first
a "pseudo" illegal copy of tegam viguard, and disassemble not for
compatibility
The decision of the court is defined as "really friendly" for the
researcher
community. This point of view is explained by a french lawyer there :http://maitre.eolas.free.fr/journal/index.php?2005/03/08/87-guillermito-con
damne-mais-tres-legerement
See ya. _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://www.secunia.com/ ._______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://www.secunia.com/
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://www.secunia.com/
Current thread:
- Publishing exploit code ruled illegal in France? sec-list (Mar 09)
- Re: Publishing exploit code ruled illegal in France? Gregh (Mar 09)
- Re: Publishing exploit code ruled illegal in France? Vincent Archer (Mar 10)
- Re: Publishing exploit code ruled illegal in France? jean-philippe Gaulier (Mar 10)
- Re: Publishing exploit code ruled illegal in France? Liu Die Yu (Mar 11)
- Re: Publishing exploit code ruled illegal in France? class 101 (Mar 11)
- Re: Publishing exploit code ruled illegal in France? Liu Die Yu (Mar 11)
- Re: Publishing exploit code ruled illegal in France? Georgi Guninski (Mar 10)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Publishing exploit code ruled illegal in France? Burnes, James (Mar 10)
- Re: Publishing exploit code ruled illegal in France? Vincent Archer (Mar 11)
- Re: Publishing exploit code ruled illegal in France? securitynews (Mar 11)
- RE: Publishing exploit code ruled illegal in France? class 101 (Mar 11)
- Re: Publishing exploit code ruled illegal in France? Gregh (Mar 09)