Full Disclosure mailing list archives

RE: RealVNC/WinVNC Multiple vulnerabilities


From: "James Weatherall" <jnw () realvnc com>
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 16:45:04 +0100

"Class101",

Sorry, perhaps I wasn't clear:  There are valid reasons for wanting to run
servers without requiring authentication of viewers.  Have you asked the
people who's servers you're scanning whether they intended them to be
configured that way?

Cheers,

Wez @ RealVNC Ltd.


-----Original Message-----
From: class [mailto:ad () class101 org] 
Sent: 20 June 2005 16:34
To: James Weatherall
Cc: vnc-list () realvnc com; 'Full-Disclosure'
Subject: Re: RealVNC/WinVNC Multiple vulnerabilities

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
 
As I've stated previously, "No Authentication" must be explicitly
configured and is not enabled by default. What makes you think the
servers in question aren't intended to be configured that way?

yep why not, assuming there is so dumb peoples, they will be owned
very soon is my guess with or without my scan, its up to everyone
knowing c to scan this
.
James Weatherall a écrit :

FYI, "passworded means it's passworded" isn't really a very helpful
description, given that "password" is a noun! It sounds like
dfind's developers really mean "Is configured to require a
password". Again, you may wish to suggest a change of text to
them.

thats why it's displayed only when you -vv (hardverbose, else all go
to the file), anyway looks like you wont remove it so keep up the good
work on vnc, a pity that weakness,...
how many admins are knowing that they are running their vnc without
any passwords, it shouldnt be so low man regarding the high number of
"no auth" :)


annyway cheers and sorry for the crap language I have.
"class101",

As I've stated previously, "No Authentication" must be explicitly
configured and is not enabled by default. What makes you think the
servers in question aren't intended to be configured that way?

FYI, "passworded means it's passworded" isn't really a very helpful
description, given that "password" is a noun! It sounds like
dfind's developers really mean "Is configured to require a
password". Again, you may wish to suggest a change of text to
them.

Cheers,

Wez @ RealVNC Ltd.


-----Original Message----- From: class [mailto:ad () class101 org]
Sent: 20 June 2005 15:58 Cc: James Weatherall;
vnc-list () realvnc com; 'Full-Disclosure' Subject: Re:
RealVNC/WinVNC Multiple vulnerabilities



Of course, if you think you know of any viable attacks on VNC
servers then feel free to get in touch.

sure I have mailed you a nice list of ip:5900 shomydeskt0p :) funny
no ? good lines ? ;)

The output that you've included just seems to show that (assuming
"passworded" means "was able to guess password") your VNC
Servers have been configured with poorly chosen passwords.

passworded mean its passworded , nothing much, my scan doesnt
include any password brteforce, but it show you how easy it is to
scan for your app with "No authentications", who is enough crazy
thos days to add such options ? so easy hacking :)

The output that you've included just seems to show that
(assuming "passworded" means "was able to guess password") your
VNC Servers have been configured with poorly chosen passwords.





-----Original Message----- From: vnc-list-admin () realvnc com
[mailto:vnc-list-admin () realvnc com] On Behalf Of
class101 () phreaker net Sent: 19 June 2005 15:35 To:
vnc-list () realvnc com Cc: Full-Disclosure Subject:
RealVNC/WinVNC Multiple vulnerabilities

Two simple vulnerabilities wich may lead to an os guess + null
session + several others infos while scanning port 5900, low
risk on paper but high online risk:

My 2cent suggestion to the realvnc team would be to totally
remove this "No Authentication" option wich wasnt present in
the oldold winvnc, and to standardize what is answering all
your servers to restrict the private informations guessing.


quick screenshot( of a simple dfind scanning test on a range
that I thought really secured :>):

***.7.41:5900 realvnc4 ssl encryption ***.16.83:5900 realvnc4
passworded (free ed. win32) ***.16.91:5900 realvnc4 passworded
(free ed. win32) ***.16.113:5900 realvnc4 passworded (free ed.
win32) ***.16.163:5900 realvnc4 passworded (free ed.
x86/SPARC/HPUX) ***.16.180:5900 realvnc4 passworded (free ed.
x86/SPARC/HPUX) ***.16.202:5900 RealVNC4 NULL Session (free ed.
x86/SPARC/HPUX) ***.16.237:5900 realvnc4 passworded (free ed.
x86/SPARC/HPUX) ***.22.217:5900 realvnc4 passworded (free ed.
x86/SPARC/HPUX) ***.29.91:5900 realvnc4 passworded (free ed.
x86/SPARC/HPUX) ***.29.92:5900 RealVNC4 NULL Session
(perso/enterp ed. win32 encryption:OFF) ***.29.93:5900 realvnc4
passworded (free ed. x86/SPARC/HPUX) ***.29.157:5900 realvnc4
passworded (perso/enterp ed. win32 encryption:OFF)
***.29.201:5900 realvnc4 passworded (free ed. x86/SPARC/HPUX)
***.29.234:5900 realvnc4 passworded (free ed. win32)
***.35.45:5900 realvnc4 passworded (perso/enterp ed. win32
encryption:ON) ***.40.192:5900 RealVNC4 NULL Session
(perso/enterp ed. win32 encryption:ON)

If you are seeking for more informations and you are from
@realvnc.com, email me, or else look at class101.org and
hat-squad.com

_______________________________________________ VNC-List mailing
list VNC-List () realvnc com To remove yourself from the list visit:
http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (MingW32)
 
iD8DBQFCtuHuLyZ8K9aT7rARAoKgAJwKGCWNveiuiOEkrzdPApCpSKegOQCgsjiR
xa8MeTetlnH2GvFsYIWOIxk=
=pff0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/


Current thread: