Full Disclosure mailing list archives

Re: ICMP Covert channels question


From: Paul Schmehl <pauls () utdallas edu>
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 18:04:15 -0600

--On Friday, January 28, 2005 11:45:00 PM +0100 cyberpixl <cyberpixl () gmail com> wrote:

Assume there is a local machine (our target) with ip 192.168.0.2 that
is connected to the internet using a router 192.168.0.1/88.88.88.88
(that is not blocking icmp packets) and my machine is say,
33.33.33.33. If i then send an icmp packet to the 88.88.88.88 router
with source ip set to 192.168.0.2, would it forward that packet to the
host in its local network, or will it discard it? Is there any way to
deliver my packet to that local machine?

No, because non-routeable addresses are...well....non-routeable. The only exception to this is *if* the target machine already had a session going with 33.33.33.33 (and it would obviously be nat'd/pat'd) there is a snort time frame within with your icmp packet would be delivered because the firewall is still translating the address/port for that session.

Of course you have to know in advance all those variables, so, since you're sitting right there, just pound the dern thing with a hammer and be done with it. :-)

Paul Schmehl (pauls () utdallas edu)
Adjunct Information Security Officer
The University of Texas at Dallas
AVIEN Founding Member
http://www.utdallas.edu
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html


Current thread: