Full Disclosure mailing list archives
RE: [lists] Terminal Server vulnerabilities
From: "Curt Purdy" <purdy () tecman com>
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 14:38:30 -0600
Daniel Sichel wrote: <snip>
Naturally I don't like this answer because of horror stories I have heard about Terminal server. They claim there are no unfixed vulnerabilities to Terminal Server on Windows Server 2000 Service Pack 4.
The problem with terminal server is not any vulnerablities that can be exploited, but the fact that administrator can be bruteforced (6 attempts followed by reconnect) and that it is screaming its existence on port 3889. If you use it, definitely change the port in the registry. Curt Purdy CISSP, GSEC, CNE, MCSE+I, CCDA Information Security Engineer DP Solutions ----------------------------- If you spend more on coffee than on IT security, you will be hacked. What's more, you deserve to be hacked. -- former White House cybersecurity czar Richard Clarke _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- Terminal Server vulnerabilities Daniel Sichel (Jan 24)
- RE: [lists] Terminal Server vulnerabilities Curt Purdy (Jan 25)
- Re: [lists] Terminal Server vulnerabilities Steve Tornio (Jan 25)
- RE: [lists] Terminal Server vulnerabilities ALD, Aditya, Aditya Lalit Deshmukh (Jan 27)
- Re: [lists] Terminal Server vulnerabilities Jan Muenther (Jan 27)
- RE: [lists] Terminal Server vulnerabilities ALD, Aditya, Aditya Lalit Deshmukh (Jan 27)
- Re: [lists] Terminal Server vulnerabilities Jan Muenther (Jan 27)
- Re: [lists] Terminal Server vulnerabilities Steve Tornio (Jan 25)
- RE: [lists] Terminal Server vulnerabilities Curt Purdy (Jan 25)
- Re: Terminal Server vulnerabilities Valdis . Kletnieks (Jan 27)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Terminal Server vulnerabilities Daniel H. Renner (Jan 24)
- RE: Re: Terminal Server vulnerabilities Larry Seltzer (Jan 25)