Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Moderated lists
From: "Dave Korn" <davek_throwaway () hotmail com>
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 18:20:42 -0000
FullDis.20.mandoskippy () spamgourmet com wrote in news:D69299EC1906F7459F298BAC6EAD4AA66B05@oliver.OMERNIK.LOCAL
Yes, it would make it only marginally more difficult, but instead of getting 50 emails calling a troll immature (the actual feedback they are looking to get) They get no feedback, just "Vote to remove netdev or what ever" based on a certain number, if it is reached, then the person has to go create an account. Eventually, without the flames to the original troll,
Except, of course, that that isn't remotely how it would work. As you have seen, people can't resist replying with a flame to a troll. Yes, people would go off and vote, but then they'd come back, and post flames to the troll about how they'd just been voting and he was gonna get his ass kicked off the list. We'd still have just the same amount of noise as ever. Personally I love it, reminds me of usenet on a good day. cheers, DaveK -- Can't think of a witty .sigline today.... _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- Moderated lists FullDis . 20 . mandoskippy (Dec 15)
- Re: Moderated lists Andy Lindeman (Dec 15)
- Message not available
- Re: Moderated lists Joe Average (Dec 15)
- Message not available
- Re: Moderated lists Andy Lindeman (Dec 15)
- RE: Moderated lists Aditya Deshmukh (Dec 15)
- Re: Moderated lists (NO) ad () heapoverflow com (Dec 16)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Moderated lists Todd Towles (Dec 15)
- Re: Moderated lists bkfsec (Dec 15)
- RE: Moderated lists Randall M (Dec 16)
- RE: Moderated lists FullDis . 20 . mandoskippy (Dec 15)
- Re: Moderated lists Dave Korn (Dec 16)
- RE: Moderated lists Xyberpix (Dec 16)
- RE: Moderated lists Xyberpix (Dec 16)
- RE: Moderated lists gwood (Dec 16)