RE: A CALL FOR FULL-DISCLOSURE TO BECOME AMODERATED LIST

["Lane Weast" <lweast () leeclerk org>]

Please reject email from the rude people who insist on typing in all
caps.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Thu, 15 Dec 2005 08:16:46 -0800
<uber () hush com> wrote:

> I WOULD JUST LIKE TO EXPRESS MY DEEP SUPPORT FOR THIS IDEA.  MAKING
> THE LIST MODERATED WOULD REALLY HELP MY JOB AS A SECURITY 
> RESEARCHER.  I COULD MAKE QUICKER, MORE WELL INFORMED CHOICES IN MY 
> DAY TO DAY TASKS OF PEN TESTING LEGITIMATELY.  I WILL ONLY GET THE 
> GOOD STUFF AND NONE OF THIS PISSING CONTEST WHICH IS KILLING THIS 
> LIST.  MODERATING WOULD MAKE THE LIST MUCH MORE PROFESSIONAL AND 
> WOULD BRING IT ONE STEP ABOVE SECURITY FOCUS.
>
> ONCE AGAIN.  I AM 150% FOR THE MODERATION OF FULL-DISCLOSURE.

Moderation... moderation...
Well..

If you smoke a pipe and think about it you'll get 2 problems:

1. Moderation is a kind of cencorship
2. Who should moderate the list? 1 guy? 2? 3? 4?
   Do they realy know what IS importent for everybody?

I would angree that users who spam too much should get kicked of. But as
I said.. if you smoke a pipe you'll get some ideas:

You could delete e-Mails from such idiots. Or you could train "bmf". ;-)

Kind regards,
Rembrandt
- -- 
God did a bless on me,
So accapt the dark side in you.
Hate leads me to victory, so give me a war.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (OpenBSD)

iD8DBQFDoZqIHXWDTKj6tTkRAk6XAKCWyvXnKQGLyo9VrYk5Jlzgi4+dOQCgzJnL
Z8JKp0tI4vrcyeMR8UAzock=
=KSKI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/


_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/