Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Breaking LoJack for Laptops
From: Bob Hacker <bob.hacker () gmail com>
Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 20:05:42 -0600
sorry i misplaced your post with your reality, I replied simply with... Bob Hacker to Stan More options Dec 24 (1 day ago) Its outstanding, I was being sarcastic just out of context. Happy New Year List ! =) !Z I replied to stan not the list. Guess I should Have. On Sun, 25 Dec 2005 13:38:15 -0800 Bob Hacker <bob.hacker () gmail com> wrote: Let me clarify this this to you and others who don't understand the slightest about much.
Allowing 192* to be called from is absurd. And its not that hard to whois the ip, contact the isp who now these days hand over information to almost* anyone with a nice fancy letterhead from a lawyers office. Saying
In case you didn't realize it, the 192.168 range is private. Go whois yourself silly trying to find out. Better yet go ask around who is 192.168.x.x for kicks.
Dear Mr ISP bad person using this IP has stolen laptop that sold on ebay for 50 bucks, please give us his address so we may take him to court and charge him with possession of stolen property, a misdemenor in most states.
For your information you seem to know little about how things work. Go ask any provider for information with any kind of letterhead you'd like. See what they will tell you. You seem to be stuck on stupid assuming a bonafide provider is going to budge simply because some letterhead. Without a court order you'd be wasting a piece of paper.
Yes its logical. But in theory I think the whole thing is like the MS key validate, disable it in windows add-ons and move on. Its like that one time at bandcamp when i was on a lan and didnt know my ip so i went to steve gibsons site.
Wow you are so 31337 to run over to Gibson's site. Case in point no need to further clarify anything on my original post. Don't make an ass out of yourself responding when you have one half of one half of a smidgen of a clue.
Note. I am sure anyone who has a purchased a stolen laptop , it had a password on it. So the OS was already installed. just my .02
Instead of wasting time making yourself look more clueless you should take some time and actually run along and learn something productive. The message had nothing to do with a stolen laptop, it had to do with defeating its protection. Whether or not it had/has a password is irrelevant. And your last comment made no sense so take your two cents and buy yourself a clue. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Note: This signature can be verified at https://www.hushtools.com/verify Version: Hush 2.4 wkYEARECAAYFAkOvRFYACgkQo8cxM8/cskrwrwCfc5wIUtYDj1vt5e5A62IKSeNj8UEA n0t1uEQ6cJfU51iu24hKwzaZRQpi =gxB0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- Concerned about your privacy? Instantly send FREE secure email, no account required http://www.hushmail.com/send?l=480 Get the best prices on SSL certificates from Hushmail https://www.hushssl.com?l=485
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- Re: Breaking LoJack for Laptops, (continued)
- Re: Breaking LoJack for Laptops Bob Hacker (Dec 25)
- Re: Breaking LoJack for Laptops Bob Franklin (Dec 25)
- RE: [inbox] Breaking LoJack for Laptops Exibar (Dec 27)
- Re: [inbox] Breaking LoJack for Laptops Michael Holstein (Dec 27)
- Re: [inbox] Breaking LoJack for Laptops Steve Friedl (Dec 27)
- Re: [inbox] Breaking LoJack for Laptops Michael Holstein (Dec 27)
- Re: [inbox] Breaking LoJack for Laptops nocfed (Dec 28)
- Re: [inbox] Breaking LoJack for Laptops Michael Holstein (Dec 27)
- Re: [inbox] Breaking LoJack for Laptops J.A. Terranson (Dec 27)
- Re: Breaking LoJack for Laptops Bob Hacker (Dec 25)
- Re: Breaking LoJack for Laptops Stan Bubrouski (Dec 26)