Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: XSS vulnerabilities in Google.com
From: "GroundZero Security" <fd () g-0 org>
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 18:39:31 +0100
lol you wont ever give up kiddie dont you ? i do not care about google and yahoo vulnerabilities. i agree to leave you alone, but you ask for it again and again so be it. 1 person said its ok for the xss vuln. you cant even count or did you see any other mails ? how about the tons of people the constantly tell you to shut the fuck up since we are all tired of you. you say the same shit over and over again. if someone tells you facts then you ignore it, because you have no other arguments as that someone else wouldnt have found lame xss bugs in google or yahoo and therefore they shouldnt be allowed on this list. you are the last person to even dare to say something like this. you have nothing else to say then that people would be jealous of you or how precious your lame xss bugs are. noone cares about your shitty vulnerabilities you found as it doesnt require any skill at all to find those. show us some code! how many exploits did you write ? you are so blinded by your ego that you dont realize how much crap you talk and how you destory your imaginary reputation yourself. why do you think there have been so many mails against you? its not because of your xss lameness. if you would have simply provided them to the list noone would have bothered, but you have to brag how special they would make you. then you think you would be one of the most respected security researchers out there, but noone knows you. you are so pathetic its unbeliveable. pull the stick out of your ass and get lost kid. ----- Original Message ----- From: "n3td3v" <xploitable () gmail com> To: "GroundZero Security" <fd () g-0 org>; <full-disclosure () lists grok org uk> Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2005 6:16 PM Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] XSS vulnerabilities in Google.com
You trolled this thread by saying Watchfire should stop disclosing vulnerabilities for Yahoo and Google. You get the response you deserved to get. Now you're running off the thread now with your tail between your legs, because everyone has told you that Google and Yahoo vulnerabilities (especially XSS) will never be banned from FD. On 12/21/05, GroundZero Security <fd () g-0 org> wrote:yes you are right, but its like if noone tells him what a stupid fag he is, he will keep posting and posting his irrelevant crap and just ignore the tons of private mail he receives. i'm sorry for adding to the noise, but its just too tempting. i try to ignore it. but i cant promise i will, the last mail he sent just asks for a reply :P but ok...must...resist..... btw my name is not groundzero, thats my company :) greetz -sk
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- Re: XSS vulnerabilities in Google.com, (continued)
- Re: XSS vulnerabilities in Google.com GroundZero Security (Dec 21)
- Re: XSS vulnerabilities in Google.com Romain Chantereau (Dec 21)
- Re: XSS vulnerabilities in Google.com n3td3v (Dec 21)
- Re: XSS vulnerabilities in Google.com GroundZero Security (Dec 21)
- Re: XSS vulnerabilities in Google.com fok yo (Dec 21)
- Re: XSS vulnerabilities in Google.com n3td3v (Dec 21)
- Re: XSS vulnerabilities in Google.com Mohit Muthanna (Dec 21)
- Re: XSS vulnerabilities in Google.com n3td3v (Dec 21)
- Re: XSS vulnerabilities in Google.com GroundZero Security (Dec 21)
- Re: XSS vulnerabilities in Google.com fok yo (Dec 21)
- Re: XSS vulnerabilities in Google.com n3td3v (Dec 21)
- Re: XSS vulnerabilities in Google.com GroundZero Security (Dec 21)
- Re: XSS vulnerabilities in Google.com n3td3v (Dec 21)