Multiple directory traversal vulnerabilities in Claroline ... NOT

["Robbe De Keyzer" <robbedekeyzer () hotmail com>]

Greetings,

In my previous post 
(http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/2005-August/036041.html) 
I claimed that it was Claroline that was vulnerable. That is simply NOT 
true.

I was researching a different product that uses Claroline as a backend, and 
found the mentioned vulnerabilities in there. So, I made the wrong 
assumption that the Claroline product was vulnerable too.
The vulnerable product's authors have been contacted, and a fix is underway. 
Until then, I'm not releasing its name.

So, once again, Claroline is NOT vulnerable. In fact, it's one of the safest 
E-Learning platforms out there.

Regards,

Robbe De Keyzer

_________________________________________________________________
Bescherm je Inbox: Phishing - hoe te herkennen, rapporteren en voorkomen   
http://www.msn.be/security/phishing/

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/