Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: bash vulnerability?
From: nocfed <nocfed () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 15:39:38 -0500
uhmm, yeah... 1) exec 1>&- 2>&- On 8/18/05, nocfed <nocfed () gmail com> wrote:
I have two more 0day's for you to look into. This may take YEARS to figure out! 1) exec &>&- WHOA! WHAT HAS HAPPEN!? 2) kill -9 -1 WASH, REPEAT! Nobody has been informed of the aformentioned '0day' and common knowledge has been ignored.
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- Re: bash vulnerability?, (continued)
- Re: bash vulnerability? Milan 't4c' Berger (Aug 13)
- Re: bash vulnerability? starwars (Aug 14)
- RE: bash vulnerability? Jay (Aug 15)
- Re: bash vulnerability? Rik Bobbaers (Aug 16)
- Re: bash vulnerability? Jay (Aug 16)
- Re: bash vulnerability? Boris Jordanov / Борис Йорданов (Aug 16)
- Re: bash vulnerability? luke (Aug 16)
- Re: bash vulnerability? Rik Bobbaers (Aug 16)
- Re: bash vulnerability? Graham Reed (Aug 16)
- Re: bash vulnerability? nocfed (Aug 18)
- Re: bash vulnerability? nocfed (Aug 18)
- Re: bash vulnerability? Rik Bobbaers (Aug 16)
- Re: Re: Bash vulnerability? Gilles DEMARTY (Aug 26)
- Re: Re: Bash vulnerability? Octal (Aug 26)
- Re: Re: Bash vulnerability? Aaron J. Bedra (Aug 26)
- Re: Re: Bash vulnerability? Valdis . Kletnieks (Aug 26)