Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Re: It's not that simple...
From: Jason Coombs <jasonc () science org>
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2005 11:23:57 -1000
Florian Weimer wrote:
Doesn't the exploit code need a null session?
Under Windows 2000 it does, the other OSes require authenticated sessions to launch the exploit.
Not clear whether Windows 2000 allows disabling of null sessions, but the implication is not.
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/bulletin/MS05-039.mspx Regards, Jason Coombs jasonc () science org _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Current thread:
- RE: It's not that simple... [Was: Re: Disney Down?], (continued)
- RE: It's not that simple... [Was: Re: Disney Down?] Geo. (Aug 17)
- Re: It's not that simple... [Was: Re: Disney Down?] Micheal Espinola Jr (Aug 17)
- Re: It's not that simple... [Was: Re: Disney Down?] Ron DuFresne (Aug 17)
- Re: It's not that simple... [Was: Re: Disney Down?] fd (Aug 18)
- Re: It's not that simple... [Was: Re: Disney Down?] Nick FitzGerald (Aug 18)
- Re: It's not that simple... [Was: Re: Disney Down?] Ron DuFresne (Aug 22)
- Re: It's not that simple... [Was: Re: Disney Down?] James Tucker (Aug 19)
- Re: It's not that simple... [Was: Re: Disney Down?] Barrie Dempster (Aug 19)
- RE: It's not that simple... [Was: Re: Disney Down?] Geo. (Aug 17)
- Re: Re: It's not that simple... Jason Coombs (Aug 17)
- Re: Re: It's not that simple... Kurt Seifried (Aug 17)
- Re: Re: It's not that simple... Micheal Espinola Jr (Aug 17)
- Re: Re: It's not that simple... Jason Coombs (Aug 17)
- Re: Re: It's not that simple... yossarian (Aug 17)
- NULL sessions on Windows 2000 systems [Was: Re: Re: It's not that simple...] Jean-Baptiste Marchand (Aug 18)
- Re: NULL sessions on Windows 2000 systems [Was: Re: [Full-disclosure] Re:It's not that simple...] yossarian (Aug 18)