Re: Privilege escalation in Network Associates ePolicy Orchestrator Agent 3.5.0 (patch 3)

[Reed Arvin <reedarvin () gmail com>]

Hmm...that is interesting. I assure you that they were notified and
were given all of the information in the original post to
Full-Disclosure at
http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/2005-August/036022.html
well before it was posted. I was surprised that there was no reply
also.

However, they are a large company. Things can slip through the cracks
I guess. As to the statement that was made about not following
"standard industry practices", I could only assume that they would add
that to save face. But it doesn't bother me too much because I had the
best of intentions when attempting to notifying them and disclosing
the vulnerability.

On 8/15/05, NoBrain NoPain <nobnop () gmail com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Reed Arvin wrote:
> > Patches/Workarounds:
> > The vendor was notified of the issue. There was no response.
>
> Vendor Response:
> http://knowledgemap.nai.com/KanisaSupportSite/search.do?cmd=displayKC&docType=kc&externalId=KBkb42216xml&language=en_US
>
> One can find there: "McAfee was not notified in advance of this
> vulnerability per "standard industry practices". It would be
> interesting when you contacted McAfee and what you told them...;)
>
> -- nobnop
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/