Full Disclosure mailing list archives

Re: Re: Case ID 51560370 - Notice of Claimed Infringement


From: "Dunceor ." <dunceor () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 15:49:01 +0200

Since I guess this organization represent the company that has
developed this software they should have the right to download the
software which doesn't mean they are doing something illegal just
because he is doing an illegal thing.

On Apr 7, 2005 5:48 AM, Thomas Sutpen <sutpen () gmail com> wrote:
On Apr 5, 2005 5:01 AM, Ag. System Administrator <sysadmin () agent co il> wrote:
More nice will be if this .iso file is just 451,486k of /dev/random junk.
Any proves that this file __IS__ Sybase Powerbuilder 9 Enterprise.iso?
MD5? Something?

The question that would begged to be asked is how they verified it.
If they were to download copyrighted software from somebody sharing
copyrighted software, does this not also constitute a crime?  Is it
not true that downloading illegally shared software is itself illegal?
 I'm not a lawyer, of course, but it's been my observation that the
legal system doesn't often smile on those breaking the law to prove
that others are breaking the law, unless it's in a Hollywood movie, no
pun intended.

Perhaps copyright makes some sort of concession for this.  But it
makes one wonder...
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/


Current thread: