Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Windoze almost managed to 200x repeat 9/11
From: "Mike Nice" <niceman () att net>
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 10:40:19 -0400
----- Original Message -----
That has nothing to do with Windows, and everything to do with a stupid
application.
...as if stupid app developers are solely the products of Windows
environments.
No. But according to that logic it seems that Windows is a product of stupid developers. http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=3Dhttp://support.microsoft.c
om:80/support/kb/articles/q216/6/41.asp&NoWebContent=3D1 I seriously doubt that the servers in this application run Windows 95 or Windows 98. All this shows is that back at the time even Microsoft didn't think Windows 95 and 98 could run 50 days continuously. _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- RE: Windoze almost managed to 200x repeat 9/11, (continued)
- RE: Windoze almost managed to 200x repeat 9/11 joe (Sep 24)
- Re: Windoze almost managed to 200x repeat 9/11 devis (Sep 25)
- Re: Windoze almost managed to 200x repeat 9/11 Barry Fitzgerald (Sep 24)
- Re: Windoze almost managed to 200x repeat 9/11 ASB (Sep 26)
- RE: [inbox] Re: Windoze almost managed to 200x repeat 9/11 Exibar (Sep 26)
- RE: [inbox] Re: Windoze almost managed to 200x repeat 9/11 Ron DuFresne (Sep 26)
- Re: Windoze almost managed to 200x repeat 9/11 Barry Fitzgerald (Sep 26)
- Re: Windoze almost managed to 200x repeat 9/11 Vince Able (Sep 26)
- Re: Windoze almost managed to 200x repeat 9/11 ASB (Sep 26)
- Re: Windoze almost managed to 200x repeat 9/11 Mike Nice (Sep 24)
- RE: Windoze almost managed to 200x repeat 9/11 joe (Sep 24)
- RE: Windoze almost managed to 200x repeat 9/11 Geo. (Sep 24)
- Re: Windoze almost managed to 200x repeat 9/11 Georgi Guninski (Sep 24)