Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: regex vs hash
From: upb <upbupb () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2004 15:02:54 +0300
heh, what kind of question is that, hash tables partition the data into smaller tables that can be indexed by the hash of the string, so you need to do only a few dereferences and maybe some compares if you got collisions. afaik a regexp needs to process every entry atleast once. On Thu, 21 Oct 2004 20:20:39 -0600, Michael Gale <michael.gale () bluesuperman com> wrote:
Hello, I am trying to figure out what would be faster to look up, a regexp or hash table. If both files had a the same amount of data in them which one would be faster ?? Lets for example 10,000 lines ??? Michael. _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- regex vs hash Michael Gale (Oct 22)
- Re: regex vs hash upb (Oct 22)
- Re: regex vs hash Zach Bennett (Oct 22)
- Re: regex vs hash upb (Oct 22)