Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Sending remote procedure calls through e-mail (RPC-Mail)
From: zeedo <zeedo () reboot-robot net>
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 14:18:43 +0100
On Wed, 2004-10-20 at 07:34 -0500, michael williamson wrote: <snip>
This sure does demonstrate how _useless_ NAT really is for security.
Possibly because NAT isn't a security mechanism. -- Barrie Dempster (zeedo) - Fortiter et Strenue http://www.bsrf.org.uk [ gpg --recv-keys --keyserver www.keyserver.net 0xD82BDB6F ]
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Current thread:
- Sending remote procedure calls through e-mail (RPC-Mail) Abe Usher (Oct 19)
- Re: Sending remote procedure calls through e-mail (RPC-Mail) Barrie Dempster (Oct 20)
- Re: Sending remote procedure calls through e-mail (RPC-Mail) michael williamson (Oct 20)
- Re: Sending remote procedure calls through e-mail (RPC-Mail) zeedo (Oct 20)
- Re: Sending remote procedure calls through e-mail (RPC-Mail) Michael Williamson (Oct 20)
- Re: Sending remote procedure calls through e-mail (RPC-Mail) michael williamson (Oct 20)
- Re: Sending remote procedure calls through e-mail (RPC-Mail) Barrie Dempster (Oct 20)