Re: [SPAM] Fw: Joke.cpl ???

[Hugo van der Kooij <hvdkooij () vanderkooij org>]

On Fri, 29 Oct 2004, Daniel Bachfeld wrote:

> So far we have Bagle AQ, AT, AU, AY and BB for the same worm
> More proposals?
>
> This is the biggest divergence i've seen the last months. Is there any
> reason, why the vendors could not agree on one name? We already have
> CVE-entries and Bugtraq-IDs for vulnerabilities.

So far I noticed at least two distinct files which were detected as
W32/Bable.AP@mm (F-Prot) or Worm.Bagle.AT (ClamAV).

Now I get freash trash Which is decoded as W32/Bagle.AQ@mm (F-Prot) or
Worm.Bagle.AX (ClamAV).

I am under the impression it is not a single infection.

But I share your sense of utter confusion. To which the people of ClamAV
have contributed way too much. (Noticed their 'SomeFool'series?)

Hugo.

-- 
        I hate duplicates. Just reply to the relevant mailinglist.
        hvdkooij () vanderkooij org             http://hvdkooij.xs4all.nl/
                Don't meddle in the affairs of magicians,
                for they are subtle and quick to anger.

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html