Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Paranid ramblings - what's the deal? Bounded variables aren't?
From: GuidoZ <uberguidoz () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2004 16:51:25 -0700
Subject: NDN: [Full-disclosure] Shows when no limits are set or restricted shell or bat ac Sorry. Your message could not be delivered to: tycho,IC&S (The name was not found at the remote site. Check that the name has been entered correctly.)
Yeah, I get this too. (In fact I wrote to the list about it as well, including to the moderator quite some time ago.) I've simply setup a filter to auto-delete it (among the 30 other "Out of office" replies, dead email addresses, and auto-responders). Some advice: Do not have mailing lists go to an email address with an auto-responder. Period. As for the invalid email addresses, I'd hope that the mods would prune the database now and then to remove them. (It's entirely possible they never see such addresses, however all they have to do is send a message to the list and see the returned emails themselves.) For now, best I can recommend is to setup a rule/filter to delete it automatically. -- Peace. ~G On Tue, 5 Oct 2004 11:48:59 -0400, Clairmont, Jan M <jan.m.clairmont () citigroup com> wrote:
Every time I send out a memo to full-disclosure i get this this mail bounce message and it gets posted on full-disclosure. Anybody have an idea what's happening. Message Follows: From: Mailer-Daemon () ic-s nl Subject: NDN: [Full-disclosure] Shows when no limits are set or restricted shell or bat ac Sorry. Your message could not be delivered to: tycho,IC&S (The name was not found at the remote site. Check that the name has been entered correctly.) Are these guys phishing, swishing or whatever Netherlands uber alles? Or is this just their mail-server barfing? Should probably point dig at it and debug it but I have gotten in trouble for that type of "help" before? Keep on computing, even though your bytes are fried. Jan Clairmont, Paladin of the Dept. of Insecurity Department, where no redundancy is allowed or is it redundancy is required, have to look that up in the book of insecurity security chapter 4 verse 3(The bible of the Mad Arab Adulah Medula, taken from the NecronoMicron or the latest M$ directorate). Unix Security Support/Consultant I think? _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- Paranid ramblings - what's the deal? Bounded variables aren't? Clairmont, Jan M (Oct 05)
- Re: Paranid ramblings - what's the deal? Bounded variables aren't? GuidoZ (Oct 05)
- Re: Paranid ramblings - what's the deal? Bounded variables aren't? Byron L. Sonne (Oct 06)
- Re: Paranid ramblings - what's the deal? Bounded variables aren't? Byron L. Sonne (Oct 06)
- Re: Paranid ramblings - what's the deal? Bounded variables aren't? GuidoZ (Oct 06)
- Re: Paranid ramblings - what's the deal? Bounded variables aren't? Byron L. Sonne (Oct 06)
- Re: Paranid ramblings - what's the deal? Bounded variables aren't? GuidoZ (Oct 05)