Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: NEVER open attachments
From: Troy <thmaillists () yahoo com>
Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2004 22:17:01 -0800
On Sat, 20 Mar 2004 22:50:13 -0400, Steve Menard <smenard () nbnet nb ca> wrote:
But that [outlook] entails paying BIG BUCKS to some large monopoly
I wasn't implying that Outlook was the only way to go. I was just saying that even Outlook doesn't have the problem. OE is the only client I've seen so far that mishandles signatures like that.
many persons find that repugnant
While this is true, I was addressing somebody using OE, so mentioning Outlook is probably safe. :) -- Troy _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- Re: NEVER open attachments, (continued)
- Re: NEVER open attachments Frank de Wit (Mar 20)
- Re: NEVER open attachments Etaoin Shrdlu (Mar 20)
- Re: NEVER open attachments Frank de Wit (Mar 20)
- Re: NEVER open attachments Troy (Mar 20)
- Re: NEVER open attachments Steve Menard (Mar 20)
- Re: NEVER open attachments Luke Scharf (Mar 21)
- Re: NEVER open attachments gadgeteer (Mar 21)
- RE: NEVER open attachments Jeff Schreiner (Mar 21)
- RE: NEVER open attachments Bart . Lansing (Mar 22)
- Re: NEVER open attachments jacob[at]buildtheb0x.com (Mar 25)
- Re: NEVER open attachments Troy (Mar 21)
- Re: NEVER open attachments gadgeteer (Mar 19)
- Re: NEVER open attachments Bennett Todd (Mar 19)
- Re: NEVER open attachments VB (Mar 19)
- Re: NEVER open attachments Bennett Todd (Mar 19)
- Re: NEVER open attachments gadgeteer (Mar 19)
- OT MS Code names (Was Re: Re: NEVER open attachments) Mike Barushok (Mar 19)
- Re: NEVER open attachments Nico Golde (Mar 20)
- AW: NEVER open attachments misiu_ (Mar 20)
- Re: NEVER open attachments Dave Sherohman (Mar 20)
- Re: NEVER open attachments Kenton Smith (Mar 19)