Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Re: Microsoft Security, baby steps ?[Scanned]
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 11:20:32 -0500
On Thu, 18 Mar 2004 14:44:33 GMT, "James P. Saveker" <james () wetgoat net> said:
Also SMS(bits update) and SUS are not designed to bring machines up to date from gold install editions. That should be done by slipstreaming updates onto install cd's and preferably in a corporate environment you are not going to be installing lots of machines from disks so the same principal should be applied to your RIS server or albeit image multicasting server.
If you have 30K machines, figure on several dozen needing to install from disk *every day*, just due to hard drive failures and the like. And it only takes 1 junior secretary using the old disks instead of last Tuesday's..... The real problem is at the low-end corporate environment - how many sites that have only 50 or 100 machines can afford somebody who's able to slipstream updates every month?
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- RE: Re: Microsoft Security, baby steps ?[Scanned] James P. Saveker (Mar 18)
- Re: Re: Microsoft Security, baby steps ?[Scanned] Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 18)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Re: Microsoft Security, baby steps ?[Scanned] Schmehl, Paul L (Mar 18)
- RE: Re: Microsoft Security, baby steps ?[Scanned] Byron Copeland (Mar 18)
- Re: Re: Microsoft Security, baby steps ?[Scanned] Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 18)
- Re: Re: Microsoft Security, baby steps ?[Scanned] petard (Mar 18)
- RE: Re: Microsoft Security, baby steps ?[Scanned] Byron Copeland (Mar 18)