Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Re: Microsoft Security, baby steps ?
From: Dave Horsfall <dave () horsfall org>
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 21:47:22 +1100 (EST)
On Wed, 17 Mar 2004, Daniele Muscetta wrote:
....I know, you roughly have some 26 Megabytes of patches to be installed POST-SP4 and POST IE60SP1 on W2K. Is any other OS any better lately ?
OpenBSD. FreeBSD. NetBSD. BSD/OS. See the pattern? I had a BSD/OS box exposed to the Net without a firewall for *years*; it was quite funny watching Penguin/OS exploits against it. -- Dave Horsfall DTM VK2KFU Loyal Unix user since 1975 Booted from Spamtools for dissing the moderator: www.horsfall.org/levine.mail _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- Re: Re: Microsoft Security, baby steps ?, (continued)
- Re: Re: Microsoft Security, baby steps ? Nick FitzGerald (Mar 16)
- Re: Re: Microsoft Security, baby steps ? Paul Schmehl (Mar 16)
- Re: Re: Microsoft Security, baby steps ? Luke Scharf (Mar 17)
- Re: Re: Microsoft Security, baby steps ? Daniele Muscetta (Mar 17)
- RE: Re: Microsoft Security, baby steps ? Andrew Aris (Mar 17)
- Re: Re: Microsoft Security, baby steps ? Nick FitzGerald (Mar 17)
- Re: Re: Microsoft Security, baby steps ? Blue Boar (Mar 16)
- Re: Re: Microsoft Security, baby steps ? Geoincidents (Mar 16)
- Re: Re: Microsoft Security, baby steps ? Daniele Muscetta (Mar 17)
- Re: Re: Microsoft Security, baby steps ? Dave Horsfall (Mar 17)
- Re: Re: Microsoft Security, baby steps ? Daniele Muscetta (Mar 17)
- Re: Re: Microsoft Security, baby steps ? Ron DuFresne (Mar 17)
- Re: Re: Microsoft Security, baby steps ? Daniele Muscetta (Mar 17)
- Re: Re: Microsoft Security, baby steps ? Guido van Rooij (Mar 18)