Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Backdoor not recognized by Kaspersky
From: Rodrigo Barbosa <rodrigob () suespammers org>
Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2004 18:21:49 -0300
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, Mar 04, 2004 at 11:35:17PM +0530, Aditya, ALD [Aditya Lalit Deshmukh] wrote:
My idea is that the MDA simply tag the messages, and that the MUA, either localy or using some POP-like protocol, read the flag and, following users configurations, either dump or accept the message.anything that requires some things to be changes will not be accepted and deployed quickly.
If ever, yes. One of the advantages of the system I described is that it will work even if you only deply it on a single MTA. Small drop in the ocean, but should improve a bit.
This point comes to my mind after having serious problems with ISPs rejecting emails that were destined to me, but were not spam. Currently, I'm having serious problems receiving e-mails from a business partner at Korea, cause the ISP simply decided to drop all e-mails from that company's netblock.this is where the blacklist are useful. a combination of spam assassain+postfix+avir mail+tarpit is very good at keeping the spam out of the system. if the compony is seriouly into spam filtering simply rejecting is not the answer but rejecting it intelligently is the answer
My point exactly.
isnt this therd going in places where it is not supposed to go ? smtp server and spam issues, when it should have stayed in backdoors. is it time to kill this thread ?
This kind of discussion has been going around the net for a long time now. I'm sure we all see at least a thread like this every day, on at list one of the lists we all subscribe. And yes, you are right. Maybe it is time to kill it. I'm stopping here. - -- Rodrigo Barbosa <rodrigob () suespammers org> "Quid quid Latine dictum sit, altum viditur" "Be excellent to each other ..." - Bill & Ted (Wyld Stallyns) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAR53tpdyWzQ5b5ckRAnOuAJ9BCAugOQvZQXnidnG8CkuiRqUMmwCgmjeV y1hdDSdjFN1qQSzbA2LgX8I= =XhtK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- Re: Backdoor not recognized by Kaspersky, (continued)
- Re: Backdoor not recognized by Kaspersky Bart . Lansing (Mar 03)
- Re: Backdoor not recognized by Kaspersky Cael Abal (Mar 03)
- Re: Backdoor not recognized by Kaspersky Gregor Lawatscheck (Mar 03)
- Re: Backdoor not recognized by Kaspersky Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 04)
- RE: Backdoor not recognized by Kaspersky Aditya, ALD [Aditya Lalit Deshmukh] (Mar 03)
- RE: Backdoor not recognized by Kaspersky Ron DuFresne (Mar 03)
- Re: Backdoor not recognized by Kaspersky Rodrigo Barbosa (Mar 03)
- Re: Backdoor not recognized by Kaspersky Michael Gale (Mar 03)
- Re: Backdoor not recognized by Kaspersky Nick FitzGerald (Mar 03)
- SMTP open relays and RFC (was: Backdoor not recognized by Kaspersky) Martin Mačok (Mar 04)
- Message not available
- Re: Backdoor not recognized by Kaspersky Rodrigo Barbosa (Mar 04)
- RE: Backdoor not recognized by Kaspersky Nick FitzGerald (Mar 03)
- Re: Backdoor not recognized by Kaspersky Alexander MacLennan (Mar 03)
- RE: Backdoor not recognized by Kaspersky Nick FitzGerald (Mar 03)
- SMTP rejecting wrong HELO/EHLO domains will save the world (was: Backdoor in passworded ZIP not recognized by Kaspersky) Martin Mačok (Mar 03)
- Re: Backdoor not recognized by Kaspersky Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 04)
- Re: Backdoor not recognized by Kaspersky Nick FitzGerald (Mar 03)
- Re: Backdoor not recognized by Kaspersky Cael Abal (Mar 03)
- Re: Backdoor not recognized by Kaspersky Stef (Mar 03)