Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Microsoft Coding / National Security Risk
From: Luke Norman <luke () normanonline co uk>
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 11:49:41 +0000
If this were to be undertaken (and personally I don't believe Microsoft would EVER allow it), would it not be better to have it backed my some worldwide agency. If it's a threat to national security, surely it's a threat to the national security of every country, and therefore a worldwide threat - surely better to have some agency spanning numerous countries, or at least consisting of representatives from numerous counties, rather than an american-backed project?These people would be fully supported by Microsoft (including full access to all technical documentation, Microsoft technical advisors, etc), and backed by the NSA or other Government agency.
Luke _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- Microsoft Coding / National Security Risk Richard Hatch (Mar 24)
- Re: Microsoft Coding / National Security Risk Luke Norman (Mar 24)
- RE: Microsoft Coding / National Security Risk joe (Mar 24)
- RE: Microsoft Coding / National Security Risk Frank Knobbe (Mar 24)
- RE: Microsoft Coding / National Security Risk joe (Mar 26)
- RE: Microsoft Coding / National Security Risk Frank Knobbe (Mar 24)
- Re: Microsoft Coding / National Security Risk John Sage (Mar 24)
- RE: Microsoft Coding / National Security Risk joe (Mar 26)
- Re: Microsoft Coding / National Security Risk Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 26)
- RE: Microsoft Coding / National Security Risk joe (Mar 26)
- Re: Microsoft Coding / National Security Risk Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 24)
- Re: Microsoft Coding / National Security Risk martin f krafft (Mar 24)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Microsoft Coding / National Security Risk borg (Mar 24)
- RE: Re: Microsoft Coding / National Security Risk joe (Mar 26)
(Thread continues...)