Full Disclosure mailing list archives
RE: Firefox 0.92 DoS via TinyBMP
From: "Eric Paynter" <eric () arcticbears com>
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2004 10:15:18 -0700 (PDT)
On Mon, July 12, 2004 9:25 pm, Sapheriel said:
what baffles me is how easily this problem could be countered. a simple check of bfsize versus filesize(-header and such) would suffice.
Most vulnerabilities can be countered with something very simple like a size check, yet developers don't do it. :\ -Eric _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- Re: Firefox 0.92 DoS via TinyBMP, (continued)
- Re: Firefox 0.92 DoS via TinyBMP William Warren (Jul 12)
- Re: Firefox 0.92 DoS via TinyBMP Ali Campbell (Jul 12)
- Re: Firefox 0.92 DoS via TinyBMP David Huecking (Jul 12)
- Re: Firefox 0.92 DoS via TinyBMP st3ng4h (Jul 12)
- Re: Firefox 0.92 DoS via TinyBMP Jordan Cole (stilist) (Jul 12)
- Re: Firefox 0.92 DoS via TinyBMP Maarten (Jul 12)
- Re: Firefox 0.92 DoS via TinyBMP Ali Campbell (Jul 12)
- Re: Firefox 0.92 DoS via TinyBMP st3ng4h (Jul 12)
- RE: Firefox 0.92 DoS via TinyBMP Sapheriel (Jul 12)
- RE: Firefox 0.92 DoS via TinyBMP jhaunsystem (Jul 12)
- RE: Firefox 0.92 DoS via TinyBMP Eric Paynter (Jul 13)
- Re: Firefox 0.92 DoS via TinyBMP st3ng4h (Jul 12)
- Re: AW: Firefox 0.92 DoS via TinyBMP Lee Packham (Jul 12)
- Re: AW: Firefox 0.92 DoS via TinyBMP morning_wood (Jul 12)
- RE: Firefox 0.92 DoS via TinyBMP Sapheriel (Jul 12)