Full Disclosure mailing list archives
RE: PIX vs CheckPoint
From: "Gary E. Miller" <gem () rellim com>
Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2004 10:54:29 -0700 (PDT)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Yo John! On Thu, 1 Jul 2004 John.Airey () rnib org uk wrote:
I agree, except for one small problem. Don't you still have to delete ALL the filter rules, and reenter them ALL to change the order of the rules? last I checked there was no "insert before", "insert at top" sort of options. Just "insert at end". This and other features can really slow down the otherwise decent CLI.No longer true. The latest versions of the PIX CLI allow you to specify which line numbers, so you can insert rules where you want.
Gee, only took until version 6.2 to add a feature any firewall guru knows is a basic requirement?
like the IOS CLI, but has lots of subtle differences that will byte you when you least expect it.Can you name one? I find it a pain the other way round, like not being able to "write mem" when in configuration.
That one will do. Not used a PIX in 3 years so my memory iis weak. Not actually backing up your config to NVRAM could have pretty interesting consequences. RGDS GARY - --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Gary E. Miller Rellim 20340 Empire Blvd, Suite E-3, Bend, OR 97701 gem () rellim com Tel:+1(541)382-8588 Fax: +1(541)382-8676 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFA5E/Y8KZibdeR3qURAtMbAJ0XCFnGPu6sZv7Wq0WQqrEZLkjIYgCfbbxy 1biUG15cGEnRMMo29fX45AI= =0+MA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- RE: PIX vs CheckPoint John . Airey (Jul 01)
- RE: PIX vs CheckPoint Gary E. Miller (Jul 01)