Full Disclosure mailing list archives
RE: [inbox] Re: Anti-MS drivel
From: "Curt Purdy" <purdy () tecman com>
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2004 12:49:20 -0600
tobias wrote:
What's the incentive to make the vendor change? It's going to take one HUGE boycott to achieve that, HUGE becuase the market is worlwide
The ultimate solution to solve this problem would be a free market with free competition and no entry barriers for potential competitors for Microsoft.
We won't have to boycott, the market will decide. In 10 years MS may not be dead, but they will not be dominant IMHO. The tide turned the day Novell bought Suse. The only thing Linux lacked for the enterprise was enterprise level support and Novell just gave it that. And we in security have always known that Netware was not only the best networking OS around, but also the most secure. When admins come to realize they will patch once or twice a year, how much work they will save, I believe Novell share will grow dramatically, in both Netware and Linux.
Apply liability laws to software and IT products in general.
Liability laws do apply, unfortunately we sell our soul and give up all rights when we scroll down and hit F8.
And let's face it, many of the folks on this and other lists that buy a PC, wipe windows and install a *bsd or linux/*nix clone, are still contributing to the redmond bottom line of their big buck, cause most those PC's come pre-installed with a M$ OS underneath.
The cheapest PC HP/Compaq carries is a box running Linux. Again the market. Curt Purdy CISSP, GSEC, MCSE+I, CNE, CCDA Information Security Engineer DP Solutions ---------------------------------------- If you spend more on coffee than on IT security, you will be hacked. What's more, you deserve to be hacked. -- White House cybersecurity adviser Richard Clarke _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- RE: Anti-MS drivel, (continued)
- RE: Anti-MS drivel Schmehl, Paul L (Jan 20)
- RE: Anti-MS drivel Tobias Weisserth (Jan 20)
- Re: Anti-MS drivel Mary Landesman (Jan 20)
- Re: Anti-MS drivel Tobias Weisserth (Jan 20)
- Re: Anti-MS drivel Mary Landesman (Jan 20)
- Re: Anti-MS drivel Mary Landesman (Jan 20)
- RE: Anti-MS drivel David Bartholomew (Jan 20)
- Message not available
- Re: Anti-MS drivel Tobias Weisserth (Jan 20)
- Re: Anti-MS drivel Ron DuFresne (Jan 20)
- Re: Anti-MS drivel Tobias Weisserth (Jan 21)
- RE: [inbox] Re: Anti-MS drivel Curt Purdy (Jan 21)
- RE: Anti-MS drivel Tobias Weisserth (Jan 20)
- RE: Anti-MS drivel Schmehl, Paul L (Jan 20)
- Re: Anti-MS drivel Gregh (Jan 20)
- Re: Anti-MS drivel Tobias Weisserth (Jan 20)
- Re: Anti-MS drivel Gregh (Jan 21)
- Re: Anti-MS drivel Dave Sherohman (Jan 20)
- Re: Anti-MS drivel Harry Hoffman (Jan 20)
- Re: Anti-MS drivel Gregh (Jan 20)
- Message not available
- Re: Anti-MS drivel Gregh (Jan 21)
- Re: Anti-MS drivel madsaxon (Jan 20)
- Re: Anti-MS drivel ken (Jan 20)
- Re: Anti-MS drivel Gregh (Jan 20)