Full Disclosure mailing list archives
RE: Flawed arguments (Was all that other crap about PFW day)
From: "Schmehl, Paul L" <pauls () utdallas edu>
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 10:51:27 -0600
-----Original Message----- From: Erik van Straten [mailto:emvs.fd.3FB4D11C () cpo tn tudelft nl] Sent: Friday, January 16, 2004 10:39 AM To: Schmehl, Paul L Cc: full-disclosure () lists netsys com Subject: RE: [Full-disclosure] Flawed arguments (Was all that other crap about PFW day) *I* [1] complained that PFW's fool people into thinking that they are more secure - an idea you reject *AND* support in the same post [2] clearly shown in [3]
Well, you've certainly master the art of entirely missing the point. Paul Schmehl (pauls () utdallas edu) Adjunct Information Security Officer The University of Texas at Dallas AVIEN Founding Member http://www.utdallas.edu/~pauls/ _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- RE: Flawed arguments (Was all that other crap about PFW day) Schmehl, Paul L (Jan 16)
- RE: Flawed arguments (Was all that other crap about PFW day) Erik van Straten (Jan 16)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Flawed arguments (Was all that other crap about PFW day) Mike Shaw (Jan 16)
- RE: Flawed arguments (Was all that other crap about PFW day) Schmehl, Paul L (Jan 16)