Full Disclosure mailing list archives

RE: gcc: Internal compiler error: program cc1 g ot fatal signal 11


From: John.Airey () rnib org uk
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 16:13:26 -0000

-----Original Message-----
From: Kurt Schreiner [mailto:ks () ub uni-mainz de]
Sent: 09 January 2004 08:43
To: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Cc: guninski () guninski com; full-disclosure () lists netsys com
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] gcc: Internal compiler error: 
program cc1
got fatal signal 11 



Hi,

3) This is why it *will* segfault at runtime.  If it 
*fails* to segfault at runtime,
you have a *very* weird system indeed (or possibly very 
weird compiler flags ;)

just tried this on solaris9/sparc:
-349: uname -a
SunOS sb1001 5.9 Generic_112233-05 sun4u sparc SUNW,Sun-Blade-1000

using:
-333: gcc -v
Reading specs from 
/opt/nb/gcc-3.3/lib/gcc-lib/sparc-sun-solaris2/3.3/specs
Configured with: ./configure --prefix=/opt/nb/gcc-3.3 
--host=sparc-sun-solaris2 
--enable-languages=c,c++,f77,objc,ada --enable-shared
Thread model: posix
gcc version 3.3

-339: cat gcc-muell.c 
int main(void)
{
 printf("%c","msux"[0xcafebabe]);
}

-340: gcc gcc-muell.c 
[Compiles w/o compaints!]

Guys, this is getting to be a peeing contest. Can anyone confirm that the
gcc maintainers are aware of this, and are they able to make a statement as
to which compilers need their optimisation code sorted?

I mean, if we did this kind of gross dissection of every bug, we'd be
deleting messages all day and not doing any work. Full-disclosure doesn't
mean full-boredom!

To be specific:

1. Feel free to report a bug
2. Wait for a fix or provide one yourself.
3. Go back to 1 if 2 doesn't fix it.

Thank you.

- 
John Airey, BSc (Jt Hons), CNA, RHCE
Internet systems support officer, ITCSD, Royal National Institute of the
Blind,
Bakewell Road, Peterborough PE2 6XU,
Tel.: +44 (0) 1733 375299 Fax: +44 (0) 1733 370848 John.Airey () rnib org uk 

Even if you win the rat race, that will still only make you a rat.

- 
DISCLAIMER: 

NOTICE: The information contained in this email and any attachments is 
confidential and may be privileged. If you are not the intended 
recipient you should not use, disclose, distribute or copy any of the 
content of it or of any attachment; you are requested to notify the 
sender immediately of your receipt of the email and then to delete it 
and any attachments from your system. 

RNIB endeavours to ensure that emails and any attachments generated by 
its staff are free from viruses or other contaminants. However, it 
cannot accept any responsibility for any  such which are transmitted.
We therefore recommend you scan all attachments. 

Please note that the statements and views expressed in this email and 
any attachments are those of the author and do not necessarily represent 
those of RNIB. 

RNIB Registered Charity Number: 226227 

Website: http://www.rnib.org.uk 

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html


Current thread: