Full Disclosure mailing list archives

Re: OpenBSD 'pf' port (was FreeBSD heap to Linux)


From: "Filipe A." <incognito () patria ath cx>
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2004 17:44:23 +0000

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Jeremiah Cornelius wrote:

|>>What could you get from pf that you couldn't get from iptables (I've
|>>not played with the little devil yet)?
|
| Human-readable syntax.
|
| Lucid syntax is an indispensable security measure.  Errors should be
GLARING
| and obvious!

~ Apart from such subjective feature could you point us to any real
reference/test regarding PF vs netfilter? I've used both. I don't have a
problem with iptables syntax which I find more "objective" than PF's.
But I'd like to read an unbiased comparative article on performance and
detailed features that would clearly state the advantages of either one.


best regards
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iD8DBQFAGUZ2Gm5OYk54E24RAiEUAJ9f0c9XbzT5yeeeP8bPZdgGe/Ma9wCfTn5c
wCWnvRM9J3IEMevxYluzuF0=
=DTYX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html


Current thread: