Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: trust? - win2k source code tools
From: Cael Abal <lists2 () onryou com>
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 21:00:41 -0500
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Sander wrote: | Hi, | | am i right, that if this really works, it's not only a problem for windows | users, but for everyone surfing the internet? | | kick me if i'm wrong.. but that wouldn't be "cool"! :-) | | cheers, | sander. Nope, it sounds like the parent poster found tools to apply digital signatures to binaries -- different from SSL certificates. If you're running WinXP, check the properties of files found in this dir for some examples: C:\WINDOWS\RegisteredPackages\ C -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (MingW32) iD8DBQFAMXXJR2vQ2HfQHfsRAoriAJ4sOatVtYTrofmmBtJlsY//JHL5hwCbBbAH nsRukqn+ne9AL6kE0jZYuBE= =7uzT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- trust? - win2k source code tools morning_wood (Feb 16)
- Re: trust? - win2k source code tools Sander (Feb 16)
- Re: trust? - win2k source code tools Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 16)
- Re: trust? - win2k source code tools Cael Abal (Feb 16)
- RE: trust? - win2k source code tools Alan.l1 (Feb 17)
- RE: trust? - win2k source code tools Mike Fratto (Feb 17)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: trust? - win2k source code tools Sergey V. Gordeychik (Feb 17)
- Re: trust? - win2k source code tools Sander (Feb 16)