Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Microsoft confirms source code leak
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 11:31:00 -0500
On Fri, 13 Feb 2004 07:32:52 PST, "Edward W. Ray" <support () mmicman com> said:
"Does it not appear that the leak could have been done to ensure that M$ has a legal argument to abate liability in case they are sued?" I think their EULA which you accept when installing covers their ass for just about anything.
The leak covers the case where Bad People don't accept the EULA. "We tried hard to secure the code, and the Bad People wouldn't have found the hole that took out the entire ATM system if they hadn't had the source code...".
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Microsoft confirms source code leak Thor Larholm (Feb 12)
- Re: Microsoft confirms source code leak Bernie, CTA (Feb 13)
- RE: Microsoft confirms source code leak Edward W. Ray (Feb 13)
- Re: Microsoft confirms source code leak Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 13)
- RE: Microsoft confirms source code leak Bernie, CTA (Feb 13)
- Re: Microsoft confirms source code leak Cael Abal (Feb 13)
- RE: Microsoft confirms source code leak Ron DuFresne (Feb 13)
- RE: Microsoft confirms source code leak Roy M. Silvernail (Feb 13)
- Re: Microsoft confirms source code leak Jeremiah Cornelius (Feb 13)
- RE: Microsoft confirms source code leak Edward W. Ray (Feb 13)
- Re: Microsoft confirms source code leak Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 13)
- Re: Microsoft confirms source code leak Bernie, CTA (Feb 13)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Microsoft confirms source code leak Andre Ludwig (Feb 12)
- RE: Microsoft confirms source code leak Byron Copeland (Feb 12)
- Re: Microsoft confirms source code leak Benjamin Meade (Feb 13)
- RE: Microsoft confirms source code leak Byron Copeland (Feb 12)