Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Apparently the practice was prevalent
From: Martin Mačok <martin.macok () underground cz>
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 20:00:32 +0100
On Wed, Feb 11, 2004 at 01:50:22PM -0000, John.Airey () rnib org uk wrote:
RFC 821 and 822 were inadequate even before April 2001.
You told that *anyone who does not have an "open" email relay is in breach of this RFC*. I'm asking you to prove it. RFC 821 SIMPLE MAIL TRANSFER PROTOCOL August 1982 3.6. RELAYING [..] ... The receiver-SMTP may accept or reject the task of relaying the mail in the same way it accepts or rejects mail for a local user. [..] Just tell me *where exactly* RFC 821 enforces receiver-SMTP to accept and deliver every message. Which part of this RFC is receiver-SMTP breaching when it rejects to "open relay" some message? Martin Mačok _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- RE: Apparently the practice was prevalent, (continued)
- RE: Apparently the practice was prevalent Shawn K. Hall (RA/Security) (Feb 09)
- RE: Apparently the practice was prevalent Schmehl, Paul L (Feb 09)
- Re: Apparently the practice was prevalent Cael Abal (Feb 09)
- RE: Apparently the practice was prevalent John . Airey (Feb 10)
- Re: Apparently the practice was prevalent Martin Mačok (Feb 10)
- RE: Apparently the practice was prevalent John . Airey (Feb 10)
- Re: Apparently the practice was prevalent Martin Mačok (Feb 10)
- RE: Apparently the practice was prevalent John . Airey (Feb 11)
- Re: Apparently the practice was prevalent Martin Mačok (Feb 11)
- RE: Apparently the practice was prevalent John . Airey (Feb 11)
- Re: Apparently the practice was prevalent Martin Mačok (Feb 11)