Full Disclosure mailing list archives
How much longer?
From: "Geoincidents" <geoincidents () getinfo org>
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2004 21:18:18 -0500
This is a serious security issue imo http://www.eeye.com/html/Research/Upcoming/index.html I just saw this page for the first time today and I find this totally unacceptable behavior from a vendor. Where is the priority for root level exploits? Are you people comfortable knowing that a vendor has and *always will have* full backdoor access to all your Windows systems as long as we allow lag times like these? So the question is, how much longer is the security community going to tollerate this industry supported backdoor CRAP before getting back to full public disclosure with a 2 week warning for the vendor? Obviously force is required when dealing with slackers. Geo. (why haven't the news folks picked up on this for what it is, known backdoors to all Windows systems) Note to Marc from eeye, correct me if I'm wrong, most of these are backdoors right? _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- iDEFENSESecurityAdvisory02.10.04: XFree86FontInformationFileBufferOverflow iDefense Labs (Feb 10)
- How much longer? Geoincidents (Feb 11)
- Re: How much longer? Thorolf (Feb 11)
- Re: How much longer? Clint Bodungen (Feb 11)
- Re: How much longer? Thorolf (Feb 11)
- Re: How much longer? Gregory A. Gilliss (Feb 11)
- Re: How much longer? Joshua Levitsky (Feb 11)
- Re: How much longer? Sebastian Herbst (Feb 12)
- Re: How much longer? Thorolf (Feb 12)
- Re: How much longer? Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 12)
- Re: How much longer? Clint Bodungen (Feb 12)
- Re: How much longer? cptnug (Feb 12)
- Re: How much longer? Thorolf (Feb 11)
- How much longer? Geoincidents (Feb 11)