Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Empty emails?
From: gabriel rosenkoetter <gr () eclipsed net>
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 11:55:46 -0500
On Wed, Feb 25, 2004 at 01:40:51PM -0700, James Lay wrote:
What's interesting is that the To: undisclosed-recipients:; line is tagged only by my exchange server. It looks like just as some people have said...looks like it's spammers trying to verify the email address. But they send via BCC...with BCC there simply isn't a To: line (least not the ones I tested). I've looked at blocking via postfix, but no go. What I MAY be able to do is use anomy tools to do a double-check..IE:
Huh? You think that spammers actually fill out the fields you're used to seeing in a MUA? Those are cute and all, but they've got nothing to do with SMTP. They're just doing this: MAIL FROM: <BS> RCPT TO: <your@email.address> DATA . Why bother being polite and sending headers for the MUA to read if you're spamming anyway? -- gabriel rosenkoetter gr () eclipsed net
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Re: Empty emails?, (continued)
- Re: Empty emails? partysan_FFF (Feb 25)
- Re: Empty emails? Berend-Jan Wever (Feb 25)
- RE: Empty emails? Aditya, ALD [Aditya Lalit Deshmukh] (Feb 27)
- Re: Empty emails? Rommel Portugal (Feb 25)
- Re: Empty emails? randall perry (Feb 25)
- OT: Re: Empty emails? gadgeteer (Feb 27)
- Re: OT: Re: Empty emails? Jim Richardson (Feb 27)
- Re: OT: Re: Empty emails? Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 27)
- Re: Empty emails? randall perry (Feb 25)
- Re: Empty emails? partysan_FFF (Feb 25)
- Re: Empty emails? gabriel rosenkoetter (Feb 26)