Full Disclosure mailing list archives
RE: Security hole in Confixx backup script
From: "Aditya, ALD [Aditya Lalit Deshmukh]" <aditya.deshmukh () online gateway technolabs net>
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 09:45:47 +0530
(which is why 'suidperl' exists). Other than that, you're on the right track.. ;)What about a suid bash? ;-)
i believe that the shell script will run but if the user is not root then the shell script will not have root privs but normal privs of the user, this has been like this bash 2.03 or earlier... -aditya ________________________________________________________________________ Delivered using the Free Personal Edition of Mailtraq (www.mailtraq.com) _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- Re: Security hole in Confixx backup script Dirk Pirschel (Aug 02)
- Re: Security hole in Confixx backup script Dirk Pirschel (Aug 09)
- Re: Security hole in Confixx backup script Thomas Loch (Aug 09)
- Re: Security hole in Confixx backup script Valdis . Kletnieks (Aug 09)
- Re: Security hole in Confixx backup script Dirk Pirschel (Aug 10)
- Re: Security hole in Confixx backup script Valdis . Kletnieks (Aug 10)
- Re: Security hole in Confixx backup script Thomas Loch (Aug 10)
- Re: Security hole in Confixx backup script Valdis . Kletnieks (Aug 10)
- Re: Security hole in Confixx backup script Thomas Loch (Aug 09)
- Re: Security hole in Confixx backup script Dirk Pirschel (Aug 10)
- RE: Security hole in Confixx backup script Aditya, ALD [Aditya Lalit Deshmukh] (Aug 10)
- Re: Security hole in Confixx backup script Dirk Pirschel (Aug 09)
- Re: Security hole in Confixx backup script Dirk Pirschel (Aug 13)