Full Disclosure mailing list archives

RE: Clear text password exposure in Datakey's tokens and smartcards


From: "Israel Torres" <israel.torres () ssplitronic com>
Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2004 18:29:26 -0700

Simply by exposing "another" vulnerability in a "secure" system allows judgement to be made on what type of hardware is 
necessary for the "secure system" (i.e. will this system serve as a public kiosk, or will this system be at the user's 
bidding?). Vulnerabilities should be kept to a minimum and narrow the choice of attack vectors an attacker may choose 
from when attempting to compromise a target system. Once a system is compromised and rooted there is little that can 
prevent the attacker from collecting what they are searching for (be it pins, passwords, source code, etc) before they 
vanish into the darkness. 

Israel Torres


-----Original Message-----
From: Kevin Sheldrake [mailto:kev () electriccat co uk]
Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2004 3:39 AM
To: Toomas Soome; lionel.ferette () belnet be
Cc: vuln () hexview com; full-disclosure () lists netsys com;
bugtraq () securityfocus com
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Clear text password exposure in Datakey's
tokens and smartcards


Surely if the user is entering a passphrase then the same problem exists -  
that of effectively eavesdropping that communication from the keyboard?

Ignoring the initial expense for a moment, wouldn't it have made a lot of  
sense to include the keypad actually on the cards?  Obviously, card  
readers would need to be contructed such that the keypad part of the card  
would be exposed during use.  The keypad security could then rely on the  
tamper resistant properties of the rest of the card.

 From a costs perspective, I would guess that the actual per-card cost  
increase would be minimal if hundreds of millions of these cards were  
produced.

Kev


Lionel Ferette wrote:

Note that this is true for almost all card readers on the market, not  
only for Datakey's. Having worked for companies using crypto smart  
cards, I have conducted a few risk analysis about that. The conclusion  
has always been that if the PIN must be entered from a PC, and the  
attacker has means to install software on the system (through directed  
viruses, social engineering, etc), the game's over.
 The only solution against that problem is to have the PIN entered  
using a keypad on the reader. Only then does the cost of an attack  
raise significantly. But that is opening another can of worms, because  
there is (was?) no standard for card readers with attached pin pad (at  
the time, PC/SCv2 wasn't finalised - is it?).


at least some cards are supporting des passphrases to implement secured  
communication channels but I suppose this feature is not that widely in  
use....  how many card owners are prepared to remember both PIN codes  
and passphrases...

toomas





-- 
Kevin Sheldrake MEng MIEE CEng CISSP
Electric Cat (Bournemouth) Ltd

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html


Current thread: