Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Re: [FD] FD should block attachments
From: Michael Gale <michael.gale () bluesuperman com>
Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2004 13:41:54 -0600
Hello, I would have to look into the bandwidth amount on my Internet contract but I might be able to host such a site via www.mydomain.com or any www host entry that gets pointed to my web server. Right now I have a PIII 667Mhz with 256 MB of RAM I could use (plus it hosts mail). If we could hammer out some details, guesstimated bandwidth usage and what type of security concerns to people have. Michael. On Mon, 05 Apr 2004 11:05:50 -0500 Paul Schmehl <pauls () utdallas edu> wrote:
--On Monday, April 05, 2004 09:04:36 AM -0500 Bart.Lansing () kohls com wrote:Paul, Just a thought here...as you're right, having some modicum of consideration for those who have cost issues with bandwidth (I'll content that we are not spoiled, and that we...ok...most of us...pay for the bandwidth we use...TANSTAFL). However, you are assuming that anyone who wishes to potentially send a file along here can just as easily host one. Not, I think, a valid assumption...and one which, for many...would cost money. So, who gets to pay? Either someone is paying to download, if they are on a pay-as-you go model, or someone is going to pay to host...either way, it's not quite as simple as you've made it out to be.You make an interesting point, and it has some validity. What immediately came to my mind when I read that was the spammers. They expect to shift the cost of what they do to the recipients. Is that what should be the standard for security researchers as well? Paul Schmehl (pauls () utdallas edu) Adjunct Information Security Officer The University of Texas at Dallas AVIEN Founding Member http://www.utdallas.edu _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
-- Hand over the Slackware CD's and back AWAY from the computer, your geek rights have been revoked !!! Michael Gale Slackware user :) Bluesuperman.com _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- RE: Re: [FD] FD should block attachments Schmehl, Paul L (Apr 02)
- RE: Re: [FD] FD should block attachments Bart . Lansing (Apr 05)
- RE: Re: [FD] FD should block attachments Paul Schmehl (Apr 05)
- RE: Re: [FD] FD should block attachments Bart . Lansing (Apr 05)
- MCSE training question Curt Purdy (Apr 05)
- Re: MCSE training question Joel R. Helgeson (Apr 05)
- Re: MCSE training question Exibar (Apr 05)
- Re: MCSE training question Ron DuFresne (Apr 06)
- RE: Re: [FD] FD should block attachments Paul Schmehl (Apr 05)
- Re: MCSE training question morning_wood (Apr 05)
- RE: Re: [FD] FD should block attachments Bart . Lansing (Apr 05)
- Re: Re: [FD] FD should block attachments Michael Gale (Apr 07)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Re: [FD] FD should block attachments Mike Smith (Apr 04)
- Re[2]: Re: [FD] FD should block attachments phased (Apr 04)
- RE: Re[2]: Re: [FD] FD should block attachments Mike Smith (Apr 04)
- RE: Re: [FD] FD should block attachments Tremaine Lea (Apr 05)