Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: erase with magnet
From: "Riad S. Wahby" <rsw () jfet org>
Date: Sat, 3 Apr 2004 15:17:27 -0500
Maarten <fulldisc () ultratux org> wrote:
field gets exponentially weaker as the distance increases, you would need
Nit picking: for e.g. a bar magnet it's inverse square, not exponential. -- Riad Wahby rsw () jfet org MIT VI-2 M.Eng _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- Re: [inbox] Re: erase with magnet, (continued)
- Re: [inbox] Re: erase with magnet Maarten (Apr 04)
- RE: [inbox] Re: erase with magnet Exibar (Apr 04)
- Re[2]: [inbox] Re: erase with magnet phased (Apr 04)
- Re: erase with magnet Phaze 7 (Apr 05)
- Re: erase with magnet Valdis . Kletnieks (Apr 05)
- Re: erase with magnet Tomasz Konefal (Apr 05)
- Re: erase with magnet Seth Fogie (Apr 05)
- Re: erase with magnet Cedric Blancher (Apr 04)
- Re: erase with magnet Riad S. Wahby (Apr 03)
- Re: erase with magnet Riad S. Wahby (Apr 03)