Full Disclosure mailing list archives
RE: viruses being sent to list
From: "Alerta Redsegura" <alerta () redsegura com>
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2004 10:30:05 -0500
1., First Amendment defines free speech. Source code has been proven free speech. Executables are not covered by free speech
this statement is illogical.
As Laura Jennings states in http://www.lexpoetica.net/lex/lex_technica.html: "while a2 + b2 = c2 may be illegal, the statement that the square of the hypotenuse of a right triangle is equal to the sum of the square of its sides may be just fine". To understand what has been happening in the U.S. with the legal status of "source code", "object code" and executables, there are, IMHO, some key documents to read: 1. Junger v. US Dept. of State - http://www.eff.org/Legal/Cases/Junger_v_DoS/ 2. Bernstein v. U.S. Department of Justice - http://www.eff.org/Privacy/ITAR_export/Bernstein_case/ 3. DVD-CCA v. Bunner and DVD-CCA v. Pavlovich - http://www.eff.org/IP/Video/DVDCCA_case/ 4. Digital Millennium Copyright Act - http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c105:H.R.2281.ENR: Happy reading! Inigo Koch Red Segura _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- viruses being sent to list John Lalla (Apr 29)
- Re: viruses being sent to list Tobias Weisserth (Apr 29)
- Re: viruses being sent to list Gary E. Miller (Apr 29)
- Re: viruses being sent to list gurney (Apr 29)
- Re: viruses being sent to list Valdis . Kletnieks (Apr 30)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: viruses being sent to list John Lalla (Apr 29)
- viruses being sent to list Feher Tamas (Apr 30)
- Re: viruses being sent to list morning_wood (Apr 30)
- RE: viruses being sent to list Alerta Redsegura (Apr 30)
- Re: viruses being sent to list Gary E. Miller (Apr 30)
- Re: viruses being sent to list morning_wood (Apr 30)