Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Re: [FD] FD should block attachments
From: Luke Norman <luke () normanonline co uk>
Date: Sat, 03 Apr 2004 00:29:52 +0100
am i missing something here? because i realy do not see the issue.
Yes, you areAs far as I can see from the numerous postings on the list, the issue isn't really recieving virii or anything else, it's the wasted time/bandwidth etc etc that comes from attatchments, and the costs that places on users who pay by the minute or by the megabyte. I personally don't think attatchments should be stopped, but I believe that's the argument for their filtering?
Luke _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- Re: FD should block attachments, (continued)
- Re: FD should block attachments Gregory A. Gilliss (Apr 02)
- Re: FD should block attachments Niek Baakman (Apr 02)
- Re: FD should block attachments Michael Cecil (Apr 02)
- Re: FD should block attachments Paul Schmehl (Apr 02)
- RE: FD should block attachments Poof (Apr 02)
- Re: FD should block attachments Niek Baakman (Apr 03)
- Re: FD should block attachments petard (Apr 02)
- Re: [FD] FD should block attachments Andrew J Caines (Apr 02)
- Re: Re: [FD] FD should block attachments morning_wood (Apr 02)
- Re: Re: [FD] FD should block attachments Luke Norman (Apr 02)
- RE: FD should block attachments Sean Crawford (Apr 03)
- Re: FD should block attachments Michael Gale (Apr 03)
- Re: FD should block attachments Michael Gale (Apr 03)