Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Popular Net anonymity service back-doored
From: Paul Wouters <paul () xtdnet nl>
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2003 10:45:59 +0200 (MET DST)
On Thu, 21 Aug 2003, Alex Russell wrote:
It's likely were legally prevented from issuing a clear warning, which is why I say they should have taken the service down in protest. I don't know German law, but I'd be surprised if the courts can force you to provide a communications service just so the Feds can use it.I wouldn't be so suprised at such a ruling, although I'd really like to hear from someone with familiarity with German law.
A court order might be able to tell you that they want to tap some individual, and you have to co-operate in such a way that the target will not notice this. However, *nothing* can order you to stay in business. The obvious move would have been to tear down the anonymiser and stop doing business. I am sure under Dutch law, I could stop the service. I strongly suspect this is true for at least most of Europe. Paul _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- Re: Popular Net anonymity service back-doored Paul Wouters (Sep 10)