Full Disclosure mailing list archives
RE: Re: Prudent default security
From: Steve Wray <steve.wray () paradise net nz>
Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2003 08:16:20 +1200
Sigh, you are right. On the one hand, as a Linux geek from way back, I have a small sense of pride in my lack of MS knowledge. But I use MS; XP is a great desktop, Outlook is a great mail client (I also use a Linux desktop and kmail is a great mail client). So, on the other hand, I know that there are a lot of *nix people out there who endlessly bash MS without any knowledge of that which they curse. I don't want to be one of those. When the ignorant ask honest questions, don't get abusive, just answer them... Please?
[mailto:full-disclosure-admin () lists netsys com] On Behalf OfFrom: Steve Wray [mailto:steve.wray () paradise net nz] I know that there are some nice tools for doing remote andbulk adminfor the latest iterations of the Windows operating system, but from what I've seen, they lack maturity and often cause more trouble than they help prevent (DCOM? Am I right? Does anyone leave remote registry on?)Steve, you should stop now. Your embarassing lack of knowledge of Windows is all too obvious.
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- RE: Re: Prudent default security Schmehl, Paul L (Sep 30)
- RE: Re: Prudent default security Steve Wray (Sep 30)