Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: [inbox] Re: CyberInsecurity: The cost of Mo nopoly
From: Frank Bridges <Frank_Bridges () ncsu edu>
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 13:59:22 -0400
Yes, but the average car is regulated for safety and environmental issues both during the manufacture and operational stages. Were it not for this regulation they would most likely still have cranks and a manual choke.... and no seat belts or air bags. The average person has very little choice as to whether they keep them in this condition if they want to keep them on "the highway".Do you really think you could convince the average person that they need to know this much about fuel injectors? I mean, most people see their cars (and the network, servers, phones, faxes, etc...) as a tool to do business with. Nothing else. The cars are there to do a job, or help get a job done, and nothing else. It is not so much that they don't know, it is that they don't need to know.I'll point out that the average car no longer comes with a crank to start it, or a manual choke button that you have to remember to push back in. The average car no longer needs major maintenance every few hundred miles. So why are we tolerating computers that have cranks and choke buttons and need major maintenance every few hundred hours?
-fb -- ============================================== Frank Bridges ============================================== _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- RE: [inbox] Re: CyberInsecurity: The cost of Mo nopoly Chris Cozad (Sep 29)
- Re: CyberInsecurity: The cost of Mo nopoly Thomas Binder (Sep 30)
- Re: [inbox] Re: CyberInsecurity: The cost of Mo nopoly Valdis . Kletnieks (Sep 30)
- RE: [inbox] Re: CyberInsecurity: The cost of Mo nopoly Michael Smith (Sep 30)
- Re: [inbox] Re: CyberInsecurity: The cost of Mo nopoly Ron DuFresne (Sep 30)
- Re: [inbox] Re: CyberInsecurity: The cost of Mo nopoly Frank Bridges (Sep 30)